Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 37.7 to 19.5.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.7 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M2.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.732.7
Released2026-03-18—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14541210
LMArena WebDev1398—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML37%—
ALE-Bench599.25—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Terminal-Bench45.1%—
ExploitBench13.3%—
GBAEval0%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14221208
NYT Connections (extended)24.7%—
CritPt0.6%—
Thematic Generalization39.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.85—

Math Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14201208
ProofBench3%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.9%—
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1444—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13821160
LMArena Chinese14411192
LMArena Russian13831187
LMArena French1421—
LMArena German1398—
LMArena Japanese1262—
LMArena Korean1313—
LMArena Spanish1403—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14051186
IFEval—78%

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14191194

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14051218
LMArena Creative Writing13541199
LMArena Multi-Turn14121221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper