Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 33.3 to 19.5.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Gemini Advanced 0514Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.732.7
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12551210

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12481208

Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12721208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1215—

Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12741160
LMArena Chinese12741192
LMArena Russian12831187
LMArena French1307—
LMArena German1275—
LMArena Japanese1242—
LMArena Korean1232—
LMArena Spanish1242—

Instruction Following Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12531186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12531194

Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12791218
LMArena Creative Writing12841199
LMArena Multi-Turn12691221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper