Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads 30.7 to 19.5.

Side by side

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.832.7
Released2025-01-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1316

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.8 (#202), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct35.3%—
LiveBench Coding51.6%—
LMArena Coding—1210
BigCodeBench Complete49.9%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 24.9 (#156), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%—
LiveBench Reasoning67.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1208
LiveBench Data Analysis55.9%—
LiveBench54.5%—

Math DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.0 (#176), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202551.4%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%
LiveBench Math58.1%—
LMArena Math—1208
MATH Level 589.9%—

Knowledge DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 30.7 (#225), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond55.7%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1160
LMArena Chinese—1192
LMArena Russian—1187

Instruction Following DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 68.2 (#190), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following69.9%—
IFEval—78%
LMArena Instruction Following—1186

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1194

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 49.0 (#194), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text—1218
LMArena Creative Writing—1199
WildBench—73.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1221
LiveBench Language23.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper