Model comparison
MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen1.5-14B
MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 53.9 to 33.6.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2026-02-12 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1381 | 1138 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1387 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 68.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 618.17 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Qwen1.5-14B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 42.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -23.16 | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-14B leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | 1113 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 55.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 16.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.68 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-14B leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1378 | 1125 |
| ProofBench | 4% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1379 | 1094 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.1% | — |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1338 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1393 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1362 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 1362 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1171 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1358 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1353 | 1102 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1113 |
| CL-bench | 11.4% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.3% | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1359 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1110 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1361 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Qwen1.5-14B?
MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Qwen1.5-14B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.