Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 39.2 to 25.0.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index38.333.0
Released2026-02-122024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding13811235
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1387—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts13721220
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68—

Math MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math13781242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
ProofBench4%—
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—
LMArena Expert1379—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English13381236
LMArena Chinese13931249
LMArena Russian13581246
LMArena French1362—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1171—
LMArena Korean1232—
LMArena Spanish1354—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following13531233

Long Context Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query13661224
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text13591256
LMArena Creative Writing13311231
LMArena Multi-Turn13641252
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1361—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper