Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 39.2 to 19.5.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index38.332.7
Released2026-02-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3316

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding13811210
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1387—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13721208
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68—

Math Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math13781208
ProofBench4%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1379—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13381160
LMArena Chinese13931192
LMArena Russian13581187
LMArena French1362—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1171—
LMArena Korean1232—
LMArena Spanish1354—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13531186
IFEval—78%

Long Context MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13661194
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text13591218
LMArena Creative Writing13311199
LMArena Multi-Turn13641221
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1361—
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper