Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Wizardlm 13b

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 58.8 to 30.5.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Wizardlm 13b
ProviderAmazonMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.031.4
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1710

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14331035

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14221018

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14311017

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Expert1431—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14051034
LMArena Chinese14631023
LMArena French1449—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Russian1394—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following13871048

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query13951054

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14151077
LMArena Creative Writing13491091
LMArena Multi-Turn13801047

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper