Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Step 3.5 Flash

MiMo-V2-Pro and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.4 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

42.4

Rank #102 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

41.7

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 59.0.
  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Pro and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
MiMo-V2-ProStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderXiaomiStepFun
Noometry Index42.441.7
Released2026-03-182026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M256K
Max output131K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.30
Results tracked2319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76), Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding14761436
LMArena WebDev1433—
ALE-Bench785.17—

Reasoning Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200), Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3.5 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)25.8%28.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14571411
Thematic Generalization45.9%—

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104), Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math14471408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert14791422

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English14161386
LMArena Chinese14551448
LMArena French14701421
LMArena German14171404
LMArena Japanese13661353
LMArena Korean14011350
LMArena Russian14271385
LMArena Spanish14581419

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14441385

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query14551402
CL-bench15.7%—
CL-bench Life6.9%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67), Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text14361403
LMArena Creative Writing14151357
LMArena Multi-Turn14561405

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Step 3.5 Flash?

MiMo-V2-Pro and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.4 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 41.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Step 3.5 Flash share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper