Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.5 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 22.1.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1478 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1456 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1445 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.5 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.