Model comparison
GPT-5 Mini vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Mini scores higher in 5 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 55.2.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $2 for GPT-5 Mini.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
GPT-5 Mini: 40.1 (#146), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1406 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | 799.77 | 785.17 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 64.7% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 39.7% | — |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.7% | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.38 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5 Mini: 31.1 (#70), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 34.8% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 55.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -31.18 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 23.9 (#168), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1380 | 1457 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 54.3% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 8.2% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 10% | — |
| DTBench | 80.5% | — |
| LMCA | 34.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.52 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61 | — |
Math GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 46.7 (#69), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1378 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 72.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 97.8% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 6.3% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 45.6 (#86), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1379 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 19.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 83.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 75.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5 Mini: 35.6 (#85), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1202 | — |
| VPCT | 40.2% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
GPT-5 Mini: 48.9 (#137), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1385 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1386 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1366 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1341 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1362 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1355 | 1457 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GPT-5 Mini: 76.2 (#46), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1357 | 1445 |
| IFEval | 92.7% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
GPT-5 Mini: 41.9 (#132), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1355 | 1455 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
GPT-5 Mini: 55.2 (#148), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1373 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1325 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1363 | 1456 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1313 | — |
| WildBench | 85.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Mini better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Mini or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Mini lists at $0.25 and $2.
Is GPT-5 Mini or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Mini and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.