Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen Max
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 39.5 to 22.3.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 33K |
| Max output | 131K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning Qwen Max leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1269 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1469 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1417 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | 1290 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | 1262 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Qwen Max?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen Max?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen Max better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen Max share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.