Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Qwen Max

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 39.1 to 22.3.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Qwen Max specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.034.7
Released—2024-04-03
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—33K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.60
Output $ / M tokens—$6.40
Results tracked1723

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen Max
LMArena Coding14331288
Aider Polyglot—21.8%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14221269

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen Max
LMArena Math14311275
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.1%
MATH Level 5—67.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1%

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen Max
LMArena Expert14311248
GPQA Diamond—56.1%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen Max
LMArena Non-English14051263
LMArena Chinese14631254
LMArena French14491330
LMArena German13951254
LMArena Japanese13831205
LMArena Korean13841142
LMArena Russian13941274
LMArena Spanish14441290

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen Max
LMArena Instruction Following13871262

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen Max
LMArena Longer Query13951288
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen Max
LMArena Text14151282
LMArena Creative Writing13491248
LMArena Multi-Turn13801277

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Qwen Max?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Qwen Max better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Qwen Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper