Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen Max
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 38.9 to 22.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 34.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1269 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1262 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen Max?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Qwen Max better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen Max share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.