Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Palm 2
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 25.6.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 994 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1005 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1049 |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1469 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | 1010 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1010 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 994 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Palm 2?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Palm 2 better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.