Model comparison

Palm 2 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Palm 2 Google

29.4

Rank #296 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 58.2 to 25.7.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Palm 2 and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Palm 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.442.5
Released—2025-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked1025

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 28.5 (#306), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.9 (#101)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding9951441

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 18.2 (#270), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 30.1 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10051428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 28.4 (#229), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 36.3 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math10491440
Omni-MATH—46.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Palm 2: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.3 (#102)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%
LMArena Expert—1416

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 21.1 (#290), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.3 (#88)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English9161407
LMArena Chinese8871461
LMArena French—1415
LMArena German—1416
LMArena Japanese—1398
LMArena Korean—1366
LMArena Russian—1403
LMArena Spanish—1436

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 51.3 (#291), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 71.0 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10101388
IFEval—81%

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 30.7 (#280), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#218)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10101403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 25.7 (#299), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.2 (#116)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text10271417
LMArena Creative Writing9911333
LMArena Multi-Turn9941415
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Palm 2 or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper