Model comparison

Magistral Small vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 22.1 to 6.8.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Magistral Small and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
Magistral SmallMiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
Noometry Index30.243.0
Released2025-06-102026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output40K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$0.87
Results tracked1023

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena WebDev—1433
SciCode35.2%—
LMArena Coding—1476
ALE-Bench—785.17

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Pro
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
ARC-AGI-15%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles3%—
Thematic Generalization—45.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1457
DTBench61.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19—

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%—
LMArena Math—1447

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Pro
GPQA Diamond56.1%—
LMArena Expert—1478

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1416
LMArena Chinese—1456
LMArena French—1469
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1366
LMArena Korean—1400
LMArena Russian—1427
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1445

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Pro
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text—1436
LMArena Creative Writing—1415
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

Is Magistral Small or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper