Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 4 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 14.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 4.4% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1235 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1220 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 4.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1242 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 46.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1246 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1233 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.