Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 49.4.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1314 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1299 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1298 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1289 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1399 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1275 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.