Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.6 to 49.4.
- Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1314 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1299 |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1298 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1289 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1231 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1275 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.