Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.6 Flash
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 38.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86), Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112), Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1432 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3.6 Flash?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.