Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Wizardlm 13b
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 30.5.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1018 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1048 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Wizardlm 13b?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.