Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Wizardlm 13b
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 30.5.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1035 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1018 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1048 |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Wizardlm 13b?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Wizardlm 13b share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.