Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 31.1.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Flash and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2-FlashPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderXiaomiMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.329.3
Released2025-12-162024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked2132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding14431101
LMArena WebDev1330—
SciCode25.9%—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%
ALE-Bench737.95—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14201100
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math13961151
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert14251067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13921058
LMArena Chinese14621061
LMArena French14291135
LMArena German13951080
LMArena Japanese1325966
LMArena Korean1358894
LMArena Russian13871111
LMArena Spanish14201111

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13921087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14091088

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text14111110
LMArena Creative Writing13751083
LMArena Multi-Turn14041068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper