Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 31.1.
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.329.3
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1632

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding13611101
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13741100
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math13591151
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert13391067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13631058
LMArena Chinese14171061
LMArena French13911135
LMArena German13551080
LMArena Japanese1342966
LMArena Korean1351894
LMArena Russian13681111
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13441087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13661088

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text13771110
LMArena Creative Writing13591083
LMArena Multi-Turn13871068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper