Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs phi-3-medium 14B
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 9.1.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than phi-3-medium 14B?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.1 vs 36.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.