Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 18.3.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.