Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 24.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1462 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.