Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 24.9 to 20.7.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.