Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Mistral
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 16.6.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1162 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1149 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1180 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1125 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1109 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1180 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1013 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1032 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1168 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1143 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1152 |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1153 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1158 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 66% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Mistral?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Mistral better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Mistral share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.