Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 42.7.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Flash and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderXiaomiNVIDIA
Noometry Index41.335.9
Released2025-12-162024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked2117

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding14431209
LMArena WebDev1330—
SciCode25.9%—
ALE-Bench737.95—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14201202
CritPt0%—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math13961216

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert14251171

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13921206
LMArena Chinese14621214
LMArena French14291197
LMArena German13951192
LMArena Japanese13251128
LMArena Korean13581148
LMArena Russian13871219
LMArena Spanish14201195

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13921203

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14091225

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text14111225
LMArena Creative Writing13751203
LMArena Multi-Turn14041214

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.1 vs 35.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper