Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 42.7.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2024-06-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1209 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1202 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1216 |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1171 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1206 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1214 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1219 |
| LMArena French | — | 1197 |
| LMArena German | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1195 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1203 |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1225 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1225 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1203 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1214 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.