Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.9 to 43.5.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | 40.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1204 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1230 | 1396 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | 1425 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1179 | 1463 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (35.0 vs 35.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.