Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Mixtral 8x7B

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 11.0.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $0.70 for Mixtral 8x7B.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 32K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-FlashMixtral 8x7B
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index41.327.1
Released2025-12-162023-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K32K
Max output66K32K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$0.70
Results tracked2138

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Coding14431126
LMArena WebDev1330—
SciCode25.9%—
ALE-Bench737.95—
HumanEval+—39.6%
MBPP+—49.7%

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Hard Prompts14201115
CritPt0%—
DTBench—49.6%
Adversarial NLI—55.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.47
ForecastBench—56.3
HellaSwag—86.7%
PIQA—83.6%
WinoGrande—77.2%

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Math13961147
Omni-MATH—10.5%
MATH Level 5—10%
GSM8K—74.4%

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Expert14251088
GPQA Diamond—30.6%
MMLU-Pro—33.5%
GPQA (HELM)—29.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—87.3%
MMLU—70.6%
OpenBookQA—85.8%
TriviaQA—82.2%

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Non-English13921077
LMArena Chinese14621055
LMArena French14291166
LMArena German13951114
LMArena Japanese1325931
LMArena Korean1358968
LMArena Russian13871090
LMArena Spanish14201111

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Instruction Following13921109
IFEval—57.5%

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Longer Query14091103

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Text14111132
LMArena Creative Writing13751109
LMArena Multi-Turn14041115
WildBench—67.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Mixtral 8x7B?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Mixtral 8x7B?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Mixtral 8x7B lists at $0.70 and $0.70.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 32K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Mixtral 8x7B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper