Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Mixtral 8x7B

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.0 to 11.0.
  • Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x7B
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index41.327.1
Released—2023-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—32K
Max output—32K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked1638

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Coding13611126
HumanEval+—39.6%
MBPP+—49.7%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Hard Prompts13741115
DTBench—49.6%
Adversarial NLI—55.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.47
ForecastBench—56.3
HellaSwag—86.7%
PIQA—83.6%
WinoGrande—77.2%

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Math13591147
Omni-MATH—10.5%
MATH Level 5—10%
GSM8K—74.4%

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Expert13391088
GPQA Diamond—30.6%
MMLU-Pro—33.5%
GPQA (HELM)—29.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—87.3%
MMLU—70.6%
OpenBookQA—85.8%
TriviaQA—82.2%

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Non-English13631077
LMArena Chinese14171055
LMArena French13911166
LMArena German13551114
LMArena Japanese1342931
LMArena Korean1351968
LMArena Russian13681090
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Instruction Following13441109
IFEval—57.5%

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Longer Query13661103

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Text13771132
LMArena Creative Writing13591109
LMArena Multi-Turn13871115
WildBench—67.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Mixtral 8x7B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper