Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 9.3.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1420 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.