Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Mistral Small
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Small in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 35.6 to 15.4.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Mistral Small.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 33.1 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2024-02-26 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 256K |
| Max output | 66K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205), Mistral Small: 33.5 (#242)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 26.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1363 |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | 497.62 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 36.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: —, Mistral Small: 27.9 (#87)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.1% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155), Mistral Small: 19.3 (#238)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1336 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 44.8% |
| DTBench | — | 70.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 53.7% |
| LMCA | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 44% |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141), Mistral Small: 15.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1341 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 5.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 39.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 46.8% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126), Mistral Small: 30.9 (#214)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1293 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.1% |
| MMLU | — | 68.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: —, Mistral Small: 32.9 (#91)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1142 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109), Mistral Small: 45.7 (#164)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | 1315 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1342 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1341 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1324 | 1275 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1346 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115), Mistral Small: 66.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1310 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 63.7% |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#151)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1327 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101), Mistral Small: 52.6 (#165)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1338 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1304 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1344 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 30.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Mistral Small?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Mistral Small?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Mistral Small lists at $0.15 and $0.60.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Mistral Small better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Mistral Small share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.