Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Wizardlm 13b
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.9 to 30.7.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1018 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1049 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Wizardlm 13b?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.