Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Mistral Small 3.2

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 26.3.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Mistral Small 3.2 specifications
MiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index50.331.2
Released2026-09-212025-06-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M256K
Max output131K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.0938
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.25
Results tracked196

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
LMArena WebDev1629—
SciCode60.9%—
LMArena Coding1534—
ALE-Bench1,158—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
APEX-Agents59.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
Kagi LLM Benchmark—40.4%
CritPt26.6%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1512—
Epoch Capabilities Index—131.74

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—30.3%
ProofBench70%—
LMArena Math1494—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
GPQA Diamond—49.1%
LMArena Expert1543—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Vision1264—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Non-English1474—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena Russian1480—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Instruction Following1493—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Longer Query1501—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Text1492—
LMArena Creative Writing1468—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1255
LMArena Multi-Turn1464—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Mistral Small 3.2?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper