Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen1.5-110B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.9 to 38.1.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 33.6 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | 1184 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | 1185 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | 1144 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | 1118 |
| LMArena French | — | 1150 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1141 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1158 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen1.5-110B?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen1.5-110B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.