Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs o1-mini

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 9 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 8.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and o1-mini specifications
MiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
ProviderXiaomiOpenAI
Noometry Index50.334.0
Released2026-09-212024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked1939

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
LMArena Coding15341362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
LMArena WebDev1629—
SciCode60.9%—
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
ALE-Bench1,158—
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
APEX-Agents59.5%—
Cybench—10%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts15121333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
CritPt26.6%—
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
LMArena Math14941358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
ProofBench70%—
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
LMArena Expert15431316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), o1-mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
LMArena Vision1264—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
LMArena Non-English14741289
LMArena Chinese15291314
LMArena Russian14801283
LMArena French—1293
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following14931304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
LMArena Longer Query15011320

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Proo1-mini
LMArena Text14921317
LMArena Creative Writing14681244
LMArena Multi-Turn14641314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than o1-mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or o1-mini better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and o1-mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper