Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen-VL Max

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

46.7

Rank #55 Confirmed

Qwen-VL Max Alibaba (Qwen)

35.3

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 1 category and Qwen-VL Max in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 40.2 to 31.6.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Qwen-VL Max.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen-VL Max specifications
MiMo-V2.6-ProQwen-VL Max
ProviderXiaomiAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index46.735.3
Released2026-09-222024-01-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M131K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.80
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$3.20
Results tracked143

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), Qwen-VL Max: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen-VL Max
LMArena WebDev1618—
LMArena Coding1538—

Reasoning Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), Qwen-VL Max: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen-VL Max
LMArena Hard Prompts1511—

Math Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), Qwen-VL Max: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen-VL Max
LMArena Math1497—

Knowledge Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), Qwen-VL Max: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen-VL Max
LMArena Expert1548—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), Qwen-VL Max: 31.6 (#97)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen-VL Max
LMArena Vision12651212
Video-MME—51.3%
SpatialViz-Bench—32%

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), Qwen-VL Max: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen-VL Max
LMArena Non-English1474—
LMArena Chinese1532—
LMArena Russian1481—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), Qwen-VL Max: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen-VL Max
LMArena Instruction Following1490—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), Qwen-VL Max: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen-VL Max
LMArena Longer Query1500—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), Qwen-VL Max: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen-VL Max
LMArena Text1491—
LMArena Creative Writing1465—
LMArena Multi-Turn1463—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen-VL Max?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen-VL Max?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen-VL Max lists at $0.80 and $3.20.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen-VL Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-VL Max has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper