Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen-VL Max
Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#56); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Qwen-VL Max is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Qwen-VL Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 35.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2024-01-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 500K | 131K |
| Max output | 500K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | $3.20 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Qwen-VL Max: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Qwen-VL Max: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Qwen-VL Max: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1393 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Qwen-VL Max: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | — |
Multimodal Qwen-VL Max leads
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Qwen-VL Max: 31.6 (#97)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1212 |
| Video-MME | — | 51.3% |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 32% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Qwen-VL Max: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Qwen-VL Max: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Qwen-VL Max: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Qwen-VL Max: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen-VL Max?
Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#56); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen-VL Max?
Qwen-VL Max is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Qwen-VL Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-VL Max has 3.