Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 43.0.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1393 | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.7 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.