Model comparison

Muse Glimmer vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 25.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 2.6% for Muse Glimmer and 17.7% for Muse Spark 1.2.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Glimmer and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Muse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index41.750.3
Released2026-08-102026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1531

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev13551533
SciCode44.9%56.4%
LMArena Coding14161495
DeepSWE—54.9%
FrontierSWE—12%
WeirdML—60.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
CritPt2.6%17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts13961486
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.87

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Math14171471
ProofBench—43%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert13861480
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English13841478
LMArena Chinese14121511
LMArena Russian13901487
LMArena French—1513
LMArena Spanish—1498

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following13751461

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query13821475

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text13891482
LMArena Creative Writing13391449
LMArena Multi-Turn13991494
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Glimmer better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Glimmer or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper