Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

46.7

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.0 to 26.6.
  • Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.075 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) specifications
MiMo-V2.6-ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index46.732.3
Released2026-09-222025-12-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output131K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.075
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.075
Results tracked141

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena WebDev1618—
LMArena Coding1538—

Reasoning Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Hard Prompts1511—

Math Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Math1497—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): 26.6

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
Vectara Hallucination Rate—21.7%
LMArena Expert1548—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Vision1265—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Non-English1474—
LMArena Chinese1532—
LMArena Russian1481—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Instruction Following1490—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Longer Query1500—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Text1491—
LMArena Creative Writing1465—
LMArena Multi-Turn1463—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)?

Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.075 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper