Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)

Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#56); Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

46.6

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 38.7 to 26.6.
  • Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.075 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
  • Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 128K.
  • Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) specifications
Grok 4.7Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Noometry Index46.632.3
Released2026-09-212025-12-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K128K
Max output500K4K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.075
Output $ / M tokens$6$0.075
Results tracked211

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1636—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.4%—
LMArena Coding1423—

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1409—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
ProofBench34%—
LMArena Math1393—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): 26.6

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
Vectara Hallucination Rate—21.7%
LMArena Expert1413—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Non-English1392—
LMArena Chinese1476—
LMArena Russian1396—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Instruction Following1406—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Longer Query1416—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)
LMArena Text1397—
LMArena Creative Writing1391—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—
LMArena Multi-Turn1389—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)?

Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#56); Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch)?

Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.075 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper