Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Wizardlm 13b
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 30.7.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | 1035 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1018 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1049 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Wizardlm 13b?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.