Model comparison
Qwen3.5 Max Preview vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1487 | 1035 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | 1018 |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1474 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1489 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1465 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1534 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1484 | — |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1438 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1471 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1048 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1470 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1464 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1478 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.5 Max Preview better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen3.5 Max Preview or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Max Preview and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.