Model comparison

Inkling vs Wizardlm 13b

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling leads 65.2 to 30.5.

Side by side

Inkling and Wizardlm 13b specifications
InklingWizardlm 13b
ProviderThinking Machines LabMicrosoft
Noometry Index44.131.4
Released2026-07-15—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window66K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.87—
Output $ / M tokens$4.68—
Results tracked4110

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling leads

Inkling: 34.5 (#234), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14641035
FrontierCode14%—
LMArena WebDev1413—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.6 (#85), Wizardlm 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingWizardlm 13b
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.4 (#56), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14511018
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
DTBench87.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.54—

Math Inkling leads

Inkling: 31.3 (#225), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14791017
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Inkling: 55.1 (#49), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—
LMArena Expert1465—

Multilingual Inkling leads

Inkling: 54.0 (#52), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14341034
LMArena Chinese14901023
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1446—
LMArena Japanese1429—
LMArena Korean1404—
LMArena Russian1429—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Inkling: 75.1 (#71), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following14261048

Long Context Inkling leads

Inkling: 43.8 (#86), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14341054

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.2 (#51), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14411077
LMArena Creative Writing13871091
LMArena Multi-Turn14361047
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than Wizardlm 13b?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper