Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Solar Pro4
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
UpstageSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Solar Pro4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 40.1.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 524K.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 524K |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1437 |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1399 |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1416 |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1427 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1401 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1377 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Solar Pro4?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Solar Pro4?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Solar Pro4 share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.